As I mentioned over the last few weeks I have been through some training in PRINCE2 project management and change management, provided by a local vendor Project Laneways (a bit of plug they are highly recommended and say I sent you), the end result I am a PRINCE2 Practitioner and certified in the Principles of Change Management through the APMG.
As part of the change management course we covered several different approaches to managing change, predominantly based around the book Making Sense of Change Management. The approaches ranged from general ideas, to more detailed frameworks but none really provided a full change management methodology. Which is both good and bad. Good as it allows students to pick and choose the best method of managing change, but bad as there is no detailed process for managing change as with PRINCE2.
Some of the approaches we covered were:
- Lewin; Three step model
- Bullock and Batten; Planned change
- Kotter; Eight steps
- Cameron and Green; based on Kotter
- Beckhard and Harris; Change formula
- McKinsey; Seven S model
- William Bridges; Managing the transition
- Senge; Systemic model
- Stacey and Shaw; Complex responsive processes
The best in my mind are really a combination of Lewin, Bridges, Kotter and McKinsey.