Couple of related posts appeared in my feed reader today.
First was from Mark Pesce who wrote about the fact that education provided in schools currently does not reflect modern communication cultures. When a kid goes to school they have to disconnect from the “hyperconnected” world.
What this means, in a practical sense, is that students have lost respect for the classroom, because it has no relevance to their lives. Yes, they will be polite â€“ as theyâ€™re polite to their grandparents â€“ but that is no substitute for a real working relationship. School will be endured, because parents and state mandate it. But itâ€™s a waiting game.
This drawing parallels to how many a Gen Y approaches the modern corporation. They turn up because for many it is the only way to make money but it holds no relevance to their lives. They are generally not engaged.
The challenge for managers both today and in the future is to make the corporation relevant.
Or is it?
… players who lead teams in the game are learning skills that they will be able to use in business situations, when they will become leaders in the organization
The authors focus on three main components of this leadership: speed, risk-taking and temporary aspect of leadership position.
So, does it matter that the modern corporation has no relevance to the future generations because they will change the corporation to suit?
My take. It does matter, today, and only to corporations not Gen Y. It is the old story you want to attract Gen Y you need to engage them, companies that don’t will go out of business, while those that do will prosper.
The post from Collab@Work goes on to discuss leadership as temporal. Just cause you were the leader of project X does not mean you are the leader of project Y. A very interesting idea which I will explore later.